By Leonard Nelson,Fernando Leal,David Carus
Presented as a Vorlesung within the German philosophical culture, this e-book offers the main distinct account of Nelson’s approach to argument research, celebrated via many luminaries similar to Karl Popper. It was once written in 1921 against the relativistic, subjectivistic and nihilistic traits of Nelson’s time. The e-book includes an exposition of a style that may be a extra improvement of Kant’s transcendental dialectics, through an program to the serious research of arguments by way of many recognized thinkers, together with Bentham, Mill, Poincaré, Leibniz, Hegel, Einstein, Bergson, Rickert, Simmel, Brentano, Stammler, Jellinek, Dingler, and Meinong. The publication offers a normal concept of philosophical argumentation as visible from the perspective of the common fallacies dedicated via anyone arguing philosophically, no matter if specialist philosophers or philosophical laypeople. even though the character of philosophy and philosophical argumentation is among the such a lot recurrent gadgets of mirrored image for philosophers, this ebook represents the 1st try at a common thought of philosophical fallacy. in keeping with Nelson, it's within the form of fake dilemmas that blunders in reasoning continually emerge, and fake dilemmas are constantly the results of a similar mechanism--the unwitting substitute of 1 notion for another.
Read Online or Download A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies (Argumentation Library) PDF
Best philosophical movements books
Provided as a Vorlesung within the German philosophical culture, this e-book provides the main distinct account of Nelson’s approach to argument research, celebrated by means of many luminaries resembling Karl Popper. It used to be written in 1921 towards the relativistic, subjectivistic and nihilistic traits of Nelson’s time.
Jacques Derrida’s progressive method of phenomenology, psychoanalysis, structuralism, linguistics, and certainly the whole ecu culture of philosophy—called deconstruction—changed the face of feedback. It provoked a wondering of philosophy, literature, and the human sciences that those disciplines could have formerly thought of mistaken.
Dieses Buch verteidigt die those, dass bis auf leicht ausgrenzbare Ausnahmen die Ersetzung von Synonyma in einem Satz die Wahrheit oder Falschheit des Satzes nicht beeinflusst. Maik Sühr liefert eine sorgsame Formulierung der those, indem er sie aus dem im Allgemeinen akzeptierten Prinzip der Kompositionalität ableitet.
This publication presents a persuasive account of the way identification and distinction think about the controversy on the self in the arts. It explores this subject through employing the query to fields such as philosophy, cultural reviews, politics and race reports. Key subject matters mentioned during this assortment comprise authenticity in Michel de Montaigne’s essays, the bounds of the narrative structure of the self, the use and abuse of the proposal of human nature in political idea and within the present political context of multiculturalism, and the feminist inspiration of the erotic and of sexual violence.
- The Interrelation of Phenomenology, Social Sciences and the Arts: 69 (Contributions To Phenomenology)
- L'imbecillità è una cosa seria (Contrappunti) (Italian Edition)
- A Political Economy of the Senses: Neoliberalism, Reification, Critique (New Directions in Critical Theory)
- Bird Relics: Grief and Vitalism in Thoreau
- Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology (Routledge Research in Phenomenology)
Extra resources for A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies (Argumentation Library)
A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies (Argumentation Library) by Leonard Nelson,Fernando Leal,David Carus